I’ll say it. In my opinion, The Goldwater Institute is inspired by the late Senator Barry Goldwater’s stated proclivity if elected President back in the 60’s to ‘drop The Bomb’ on North Vietnam in order to end the Vietnam War. They, for whatever ACLUesque, Quixotic reason desire to force the Phoenix Coyotes to move, Arizonans to lose jobs and Hockey to suffer in a market where it is beginning to grow at all ages/levels. Their motto should be “I Threaten, Therefore I Am.”
That said,
what if Phoenix moves to Winnipeg, possibly resurrecting the Jets of old? How should the NHL re-align? If there’s no getting around the loss of Phoenix to the Western Conference, what are our options here?
The Simple GeographicOne method is for the NHL to do their best to simplify realigning based on two things: geographic distance from other teams and the least disruption possible to current Divisional organization. That might look something like this:
Western ConferencePacific Division: SJS, LAK, ANA, DAL, COL
Northwest Division: VAN, EDM, CGY, WIN, MIN
Central Division: No Change
Eastern ConferenceSoutheast Division: No Change
Atlantic Division: No Change
Northeast Division: No Change
This Course Of Action (COA) has the least disruption that could be imagined and is probably the preferred COA to execute.
While some folks may say, “COL = Pacific? What are you talking about?” Is DAL near the Pacific other than when it flies to California?
And some pundits south of the 49th Parallel may smugly offer, ‘With four Canadian teams in one division, that’ll give Canada a better shot at winning a Cup for a change…’ (Silly pundits – there is no conspiracy about who wins Lord Stanley’s Cup. It
always goes to who wants it more.)
The Alternate GeographicBut what if the NHL likes their change shaken, not stirred? They could wind up doing the following:
Western ConferencePacific Division: SJS, LAK, ANA, VAN, COL
Northern Division: EDM, CGY, WIN, MIN, CHI
Central Division: STL, NSH, CBJ, DET, TOR
Eastern ConferenceSouthern Division: DAL, ATL, TBL, FLA, CAR
Atlantic Division: WSH, PIT, PHI, NYR, NYI
Northeast Division: BUF, OTT, MTL, BOS, NJD
There are many reasons to say this wouldn’t be done.
Foremost is that it is more revolutionary than evolutionary and solid organizations usually stand upon a foundation grounded in the latter.
Additionally, several rivalries are broken up: TOR from the Eastern Conference; BUF-TOR; WSH out of the Southeast; NJD from the NY/NJ state-o-plex; and a basic unbalancing of Canadian teams between the Conferences of four in the West and two in the East all come to mind at first glance.
But there are some arguments to be made for this COA as well. All near-Pacific teams are actually in the Pacific division; a ‘Southern’ division is now truly southern in American terms; and if any Canadian team can transition to the Western Conference, it’s Brian Burke’s Maple Leafs.
While this wouldn’t be a traditional, military-style ‘throw away’ COA (one that is completely out of the box just thrown on the table for hasty discussion and discarding amongst the COAs you are really interested in implementing), it would likely not be as popular with HQ-NHL because it flies in the face of some NHL historical precedents, for the number of differences and the other detractors listed above.
And yet, there is now the Shannahan Factor in NHL research and change implementation. Hmmm…
The Alternate AlternativeLest we forget one quickly spoken statement in Commissioner Bettman’s Phoenix press conference the other day, there are other options than simply considering Winnipeg for a move of the Yotes. Not knowing if that is Toronto (II), Quebec or even Hamilton, let’s just for the moment call this team TORQUEHAM. With ‘The T’ in the League because of a move, you could make the NHL look like this:
Western ConferenceNorthwest Division: SJS, VAN, EDM, CGY, COL
Southern Division: LAK, ANA, DAL, TBL, FLA
Mid-West Division: MIN, STL, CHI, NSH, DET
Eastern ConferenceCentral Division: ATL, CAR, CBJ, PIT, PHI
Atlantic Division: WSH, NJD, NYR, NYI, BOS
Northern Division: TOR, BUF, TORQUEHAM, OTT, MTL
How do you like those apples? Here are some cool reasons to go this route if any new resting place for the Coyotes winds up East of Lake Michigan:
The Northeast Division has a nice, tight, travel shot group.
The Southern Division is where everyone will want to be on the road to in January and February (although we do note the extreme East-to-West Coast distances).
The Mid-West Division adds MIN who seems, in my mind, to always have been missing from the same division as CHI.
The Central Division tightens up their travel shot group like the Northeast.
The Atlantic is now all along the Atlantic seaboard.
And TORQUEHAM’s new division will be an all Canadian quartet playing BUF for the pride of the USA every night.
There could even be branch plan to the above, call it ‘The AA II,’ that could alter the Conferences as follows:
Northwest Division: No Change From Immediately Above
Southern Division: No Change From Immediately Above
Mid-West Division (West): MIN, STL, CHI, NSH, ATL
Central Division (East): CAR, CBJ, WSH, PIT, PHI
Atlantic Division (East): BUF, NJD, NYR, NYI, BOS
Northern Division (East): DET, TOR, TORQUEHAM, OTT, MTL
Both are intriguing, yes?
The Return Of TotoWait a minute… What if the new location is Kansas City? What if the NHL goes for long-term, grow-the-gamedness versus immediately potential monetary impact? What if that nice new arena waved under NYI’s nose two years ago is the targeted landing spot for a displaced Phoenix franchise?
How about these combinations:
Western ConferenceNorthwest Division: SJS, VAN, EDM, CGY, COL
Southern Division: LAK, ANA, DAL, TBL, FLA
Mid-West Division: MIN, STL, KAN, CHI, NSH
Eastern ConferenceCentral Division: ATL, CAR, CBJ, PIT, PHI
Atlantic Division: WSH, NJD, NYR, NYI, BOS
Northern Division: DET, TOR, BUF, OTT, MTL
That gives you pause for a moment, doesn’t it? Any way you slice this option, Kansas City as a destination for the franchise makes a modified form of one of the Alternate Alternatives a more likely, final COA to adopt.
SummaryThere are
at least five options out there if Phoenix is moved due to the obstructionist methods of The Goldwater Institute.
If Winnipeg is the destination, then the most likely COA is go with The Simple Geographic change that creates the least amount of change and turmoil. The Alternate Geographic is less likely to occur as a more revolutionary than evolutionary change, but an interesting alternative to still consider.
If the Coyotes move east of Michigan, two equally enticing prospects come to mind. The Alternate Alternative or The AA II are equally intriguing, and the best COA comes down to whether you want DET or BUF taking on four Canadian teams in their division.
The Return Of Toto assumes a move to Kansas City is the final choice. It is an thought-provoking spin on The Alternate Alternative and her sister, The AA II, that keeps the moving franchise south of the 49th Parallel where The Great Game has a better chance of growing and expanding that returning the club to a Canadian market whose love of the game can only swing in less than 10% increments upwards.
You can hypothesize changes to NHL divisions any number of ways. But you can hang on your hat on the idea that changes to Phoenix cannot come without restricting NHL divisions.
Take me to
On Goal Analysis